Popular science (SciPop) has a theoretical foundation. We refer to it as the SciPop paradigm. You may see it referred to in places as the DPMS (dominant paradigm of modern science).
Logic, no matter how rigorous, breaks down when we're speculating about the origin of the universe from the starting point of having rejected the truth: God revealed testimony about our origin.
The Word Became Flesh
We need to demonstrate a logical progression [from] the elements produced by nucleosynthesis [to] organic life with replicating DNA. Fortunately science did a bang up job of documenting it.
Radiometric dating has been contrived in such a way as to make it look as if the "dates" it calculates for rocks are absolute. Absolute means that the dates are separated on a timescale which is known.
"Grasslands limited". This is a microcosm of circular reasoning in two words. Whenever the remains of a grassland habitat is found fossilized it's assigned to something other than the Eocene.
Scientists disguise the evidence of a worldwide flood by using jargon which is something other than a worldwide flood, but this one is a dead giveaway. "Heavy rainfall." How heavy? 40 days and nights to be exact.
Trend From Temperate Climates to Subtropical
"Trend from temperate climate to subtropical". That sounds suspiciously like a way to say that it started raining a lot. Some seasonal variations? No kidding? It started raining, then it stopped raining.
Late Triassic Wildfires
What really matters in the popular science narrative of godless existence (SciPop). Location, location, location. Were forest fires an extinction event at the end of the Triassic? Or did a few burned trees get fossilized?
Rise of the Cycadophytes, Ginkgoales
The Triassic wasn't rise of the cycadophytes and Ginkgoales, it's the preserved remains of cycadophytes and Ginkgoales because their habitat was destroyed and buried in a world-wide flood. That's Paleodoublespeak.
The Origin of Abundant Diversification
"Origin of reptiles, diversification of amphibians. Insects abundant." Here we can see how doublespeak is used to establish the premise that the evolution narrative envisions the development from simple to complex.