Daily Devotion for April
The Fourth Day
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.(Genesis 1:14-19) KJV
- IF God cannot lie,
- THEN the Bible is true,
- THEREFORE if the Bible says that the stars will fall to the earth,
- BUT SciPop says that this is impossible,
- THEN SciPop is wrong.
We don’t hammer square pegs into round holes to get the pieces of Matty’s Paradigm to fall into place. It’s deduced, not induced. This is another nail to hammer into the lid on the coffin of Flat Earth.
Copernicus taught us how to imagine an alternative reality. He wrote the first episode of Star Trek. Galileo, Kepler, Newton and others convinced the modern mind that their imaginary alternative is reality.
Astronomy has grown around this assumption: stars are suns. It’s false. Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Einstein, and others stole the modern mind and gave us an understanding of the cosmos which isn’t real.
We’ve been defending the Geocentrospheric model in the Twitter community since December 25th, 2015. It can’t be refuted. There’s a simple reason why: It’s Biblically accurate.
The assumption of heliocentricity, Galileo’s bluff, affects the calculated distance to stellar objects. The heliocentric distance is greater because it is derived from a triangle with a base which is 2AU wide.
The earth is at the center of the observable universe. This is an empirical observation. Heliocentricity isn’t observed, it’s theoretical. Oddly enough, people today simply can’t grasp this concept.
Understanding relative motion is the power to comprehend that heliocentric and Geocentrospheric models coexist. The Geocentrospheric model is empirical. The heliocentric model is theoretical.
The Geocentrospheric cosmological model in Matty’s Paradigm is a) empirical (directly observable) and b) meets the requirements of Kepler’s laws. The heliocentric theory is neither a) nor b).
The Bible doesn’t describe a heliocentric system, but that’s okay because we don’t observe heliocentricity. It’s a theoretical interpretation of the empirical Geocentrospheric reality: it’s imaginary.
Myth buster: The Earth-sun orbit isn’t elliptical. The Earth-sun radius is, for all practical purposes, constant. Any apparent eccentricity is variation in the Sun’s orbital radius, not the Earth-sun radius.
Despite the self-evident truth of empirical observations, SciPop promotes a rationalization for them that has no physical cause. It’s not a testable hypothesis which means SciPop is unscientific.
If Johannes Kepler is the type for Galen Urso, a picture of the sacrificial lamb who gave his life to save us, then Matty’s Paradigm is Luke Skywalker in a X-Wing Fighter… but let’s not get carried away.
Based on the Matty’s Paradigm value for the mass of the Sun, its life expectancy is about 102 years. Now would be a good time to accept Jesus Christ as your savior.
Astronomy is an induced rationalization of the desire to have swirls of minute specks be galaxies. The word “galaxy” has been defined to meet the requirements of the popular science (SciPop) paradigm.
Newton gave popular science (SciPop) the math it needed to remove Earth from the center of the universe, and hell from the center of Earth. His work is based on bold guesses. They were wrong.
It’s not possible to prove heliocentricity, nor do we have an absolute value for the mass of Earth. The value we have for the mass of the Sun is derived from the assumptions that we make.
We can take the experimental confirmation of Einstein’s prediction of gravitational lensing to deduce that the Sun is a source of gravity. In which case the singularity at the center of the Earth isn’t the only singularity God created.
“If the theory agrees with the facts.” Albert Einstein (1905). What facts? Given that the so-called facts are an inductive rationalization which is derived from accepting the original theory?
Does relativity refute the idea of an absolute frame of reference? No. Relativity requires that there’s no absolute frame of reference because it’s a rationalization of an incorrect theory of gravity.
Hubble’s Bubble Trouble
Redshift highlights the danger of Peer Review: when speculation enhances the popular science (SciPop) narrative of godless existence the scientific community will ignore the rules of science.
Could quasars be the windows of heaven? Using the Hawking Effect: Of course, what else would they be?
There aren’t any black holes or dark matter. The missing mass of the universe is the firmament. It’s a wall on the edge of space with the gravitational attraction that maintains the universe.
When the Sun was created heat caused a layer of the firmament to melt. The residue blackened and the layers below it detached from the body of heaven and broke apart to form the stars.
Using the Inverse Square law, if a body with the mass of the Sun orbits at a distance of 1 AU, we divide the mass of the sun by the square of the distance to M87* which we estimate to be 17,364 light years.
The worldwide network of telescopes used to image M87* have constructed a picture of a piece of Obsidian glass approximately 11 feet wide at a distance of 17,364 light years. Go SciPop!
The properties of Jasper and Jacinth give us 2 confirmations of our hypothesis that gravity was created on the 2nd day. They also confirm that the sun was created on the 4th day.
Defining the Soul
The phrase “the host of heaven,” includes everything above the atmosphere, but it seems that there are subcategories within it. Can we deduce what these subcategories are, and what will we learn if we do?
Heavenly entities are sentient beings. Nehemiah tells us that they’re worshiping the LORD. Who are we to say they aren’t? If entities are gravitationally bound, then this is the distinction between entities and bodies.
All sentient beings, including Spirits, are based on a gravity node which has a specific frequency unique to each individual. It is the seat of our sentience. In the Bible the gravity node is called a soul.