A Phylogenetic Tree of Life

Get wisdom! Get understanding! Do not forget, nor turn away from the words of my mouth. Do not forsake her, and she will preserve you; Love her, and she will keep you. Wisdom is the principal thing; Therefore get wisdom. And in all your getting, get understanding.

(Proverbs 4:5-7) NKJV

Back in the early days of DNA sequencing in systematics, when PCR machines (polymerase chain reaction) were cool new toys, the data was fragmentary. We were a grad student in one of the molecular labs sequencing plant DNA.

That kind of lab work is so boring that we knew we wouldn’t survive it for long. We gravitated from the third flood of Coker Hall, where the young guns were forging ahead with all the new tech that they could get, upstairs to the fourth floor where the crusty old guard had their classical collections of specimens. That’s when we got into paleobotany.

We did a quick search on of our molecular lab professor Mark Chase, and we found this abstract from 2003 which summarizes 10 years of progress and ironically uses the phrase “tree of life“.

Abstract

Over the past decade, botanists have produced several thousand phylogenetic analyses based on molecular data, with particular emphasis on sequencing rbcL, the plastid gene encoding the large subunit of Rubisco (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase). Because phylogenetic trees retrieved from the three plant genomes (plastid, nuclear and mitochondrial) have been highly congruent, the ‘Angiosperm Phylogeny Group’ has used these DNA-based phylogenetic trees to reclassify all families of flowering plants. However, in addition to taxonomy, these major phylogenetic efforts have also helped to define strategies to reconstruct the ‘tree of life’, and have revealed the size of the ancestral plant genome, uncovered potential candidates for the ancestral flower, identified molecular living fossils, and linked the rate of neutral substitutions with species diversity. With an increased interest in DNA sequencing programmes in non-model organisms, the next decade will hopefully see these phylogenetic findings integrated into new genetic syntheses, from genomes to taxa.

– Mark Chase, A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics

Phylogenetic analysis is only a description of the evolutionary relationships between organisms if you choose to believe that organisms evolved. This is called circular reasoning, or bootstrapping.

However, according to the currently accepted definition of evolution, it’s not evolution at all, it’s abiogenesis. Phylogenetic analysis reveals the systematic way in which God created terrestrial plants on the third day, fish and birds on the fifth day, and terrestrial animals on the sixth day. This is wisdom. This is understanding.

Archaeopteris and Duke University – Navigation

SectionTitleScripture
1Archaeopteris and Duke UniversityJeremiah 21:8
What’s a Tarheel?Isaiah 29:14
2Archaeopteris1 Timothy 6:20
Archaeopteris (1991) Term Paper(Further reading)
3Carl LinnaeusLuke 12:27
SalvationRomans 10:9-10
– Navigate your way around Archaeopteris and Duke University.

August 9 – Archaeopteris and Duke University

In 1991 we (me and the Holy Spirit) scared the faculty at Duke by demonstrating a flaw in the use of cladistic phylogenetic analysis to study the Devonian fossil Archaeopteris.

Bible Reading: Isaiah 50-53


One Reply to “”

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Matty's Paradigm

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading