First mammals? A place where mammals were buried doesn't make them the first mammals. The presence of mammal remains in sediment is used to place the sediment in timeline of the evolution narrative.
Peer Review
We have considered the dubious nature of the Great Permian Contrivance. The Permian, and its supposed date being millions of years ago, isn't a testable hypothesis, so it's not, technically, scientific.
Earth in Upheaval
Earth in Upheaval is the name of a book by Immanuel Velikovsky which lays out his summary of the evidence for cataclysmic upheavals in the history of Earth.
Peer Review is Beyond Irrelevant
We frequently say that we're here to destroy the theoretical foundation of popular science (SciPop). This comes up on Twitter when someone suggests: "Have your work peer reviewed and then I might take it seriously. "
The Narrative of Evolution
The Peer Review driven narrative for the origin of humanity is that the Bible is wrong and that it took 4.6 billion years for primordial ooze to turn into humans through random chance. You can argue details but that's it.
Experimentation and Evolution
Popular science (SciPop) has been zealous in it's pursuit of documentation for Evolution. The modern scientific method was honed at the same time that Cladistic Phylogenetic Analysis was being developed.
Evidence for Evolution
Evolution is an extensively documented process of genetic change over time. Arguing against it is what makes Christians look like home-schooled, knuckle-dragging morons. Sorry for being blunt, that's just how it is.
The Narrative of the Decay Constant
The peer review narrative for Earth begins with the desire that the Bible is wrong and hell isn't at the center. One way to do this is to have a timescale which is completely different to the one in the Bible.
The Role of the Decay Constant
If the theory of evolution is the centerpiece of the popular science narrative of godless existence (SciPop), then radiometric dating has been the pseudoscientific glue that held it together.
The Narrative of Synonymy
The peer review driven narrative starts with the desire that the Bible is wrong, the Earth is billions of years old, and there's no possible way that the stars could, or would, fall to Earth.
