The Holy Trinity can be written as a chemical formula. As blasphemous as this may seem, at first, there's a major problem with it: IT WORKS as a plan for the particle physics of the universe.
What do believers of popular science (SciPop) or the Ignorant think was happening at the time that God said "let light be" in terms of something simple that we can visualize, like the LEGO building system?
The writer of Hebrews describes the creation of the universe as thermodynamically balanced. Apparently God created the universe from things which are invisible. We (that's me and the Holy spirit) propose atoms and molecules.
The idea of Christ being begotten in an act of conception is carried forward with the analogy of the labor of childbirth. As such, the Son was brought forth as if a baby was being born.
The deep existed in the beginning, before God began to create. This means that creation isn't ex nihilo, from nothing, it's ex abyssi, from the deep. This is so obvious that everyone has missed it completely.
Atheist science trolls (ASTs) pull apparently random stuff out of thin air in their eagerness to mock people of faith, but there are some recognizable patterns. One of them is to invoke a nonentity called Nonunicornism.
Adam & Eve were held responsible for their disobedience, but the fallen state of creation is part of the plan of redemption which is what the universe was created for, so how is it Adam and Eve’s fault?
God the Son was begotten in an act of conception. It's part of the meaning of the Greek phrase the foundation of the world. The same event is rendered from Hebrew as childbirth, where we get the word howl.
What is creation the verb, not creation the noun? The act of creation. Maybe we should say creating? Where does creating start? From nothing? Or is it the transformation of one form into another?
The "reprobate mind," in Romans 1:28 is a consequence of rejecting the relationship between cause and effect. It manifests as a refusal to acknowledge the relationship between behavior and consequences.