Programming a computer to plot an ellipse with one focus isn't the same as providing a physical cause for why planetary orbits are elliptical. This is an example of scientific sleight-of-hand.
Numerical Computation of a Simple Orbit
April 13th
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) have been pondering Kepler. He was hired by Tycho Brahe as a mathematician to analyze the extensive charts and tables which documented Brahe's observations of the cosmos.
April 12th
Despite the self-evident truth of empirical observations, science promotes a rationalization for them that has no physical cause. It is not a testable hypothesis. Science is unscientific.
April 11th
Myth buster: The Earth-sun orbit isn’t elliptical. The Earth-sun radius is, for all practical purposes, constant. Any apparent eccentricity is variation in the Sun’s orbital radius, not the Earth-sun radius.
April 10th
The Bible doesn't describe a heliocentric system, but that's okay because we don't observe heliocentricity. It's a theoretical interpretation of the empirical geocentrospheric reality: it's imaginary.
April 9th
The Geocentrospheric cosmological model in Matty's Paradigm is a) empirical (directly observable) and b) meets the requirements of Kepler's laws. The heliocentric theory is neither a) nor b).
April 8th
Understanding relative motion is the power to comprehend that heliocentric and Geocentrospheric models coexist. The Geocentrospheric model is empirical. The heliocentric model is theoretical.
April 7th
The earth is at the center of the observable universe. This is an empirical observation. Heliocentricity is not observed, it is theoretical. Oddly enough, people today simply cannot grasp this concept.
April 6th
Assuming heliocentricity (Galileo’s bluff) causes the calculated distance to stars to seem greater than it is, because it’s derived from geometry with a base which is 2 astronomic units (AU) wide.
April 5th
We've been defending the Geocentrospheric model in the Twitter community since December 25th, 2015. It can't be refuted. There's a simple reason why: It's Biblically accurate.