Voyager and Relative Motion
The wind blows south, the wind blows north—round and round and back again.
(Ecclesiastes 1:6) Good News Translation
Understanding relative motion is the power to comprehend that heliocentric and Geocentrospheric models coexist. The Geocentrospheric model is empirical. The heliocentric model is theoretical.
People today mistakenly believe that the heliocentric model disproves Geocentrosphericity: that the existence of one excludes the possibility of the other. Sadly this illustrates that people today can’t think for themselves.
We all have the same evidence. Our choice of paradigm determines what we think it’s evidence of.
– Matty’s Razor
“We know that the difference between a heliocentric theory and a geocentric theory is one of relative motion only, and that such a difference has no physical significance.”
— Sir Fred Hoyle in Astronomy and Cosmology, 1975, p. 416.
Nobel Prize winning astrophysicist Fred Hoyle is quoted above. Geocentrospheric and heliocentric models are two ways to explain the same observations. They coexist. If you were on the sun, you’d be observing heliocentricity. Since you’re not, you’re on the Earth, you’re observing Geocentrosphericity.
Fred was both right and wrong. The difference between heliocentric and Geocentrospheric is simply a matter of the frame of reference, but it does have a physical component which is how the assumption of either helio- or geo- centric affects the calculations necessary to derive values for the mass of the sun and other planetary bodies. Incidentally, we call this Newton’s Switcheroo.
Newton’s Switcheroo
- Assuming heliocentricity
- the mass of the sun is 1.9E+30 kg
- Assuming Geocentrosphericity
- the mass of the sun is 1.9E+19 kg
The difference between them is the factor 9.87E-12. Matty’s Constant.
Faith is believing in something that you can’t see, because of evidence.
– Faith, definition
In the Matty’s Paradigm cosmological model the values for mass of the sun and planets is smaller than the values used in SciPop by a factor of 9.87E-12. This is Matty’s Constant. Hoyle was unaware of this, but he expressed the idea that whether the Earth orbits the sun, or the sun orbits the earth, it doesn’t really mean anything. The frame of reference determines what the relative motion looks like.
We use the same math, Kepler’s third law of planetary motion and Newton’s law of universal gravitation, but by starting the calculation with a different assumption we don’t end up with a problem trying to resolve why a massive sun would orbit a tiny (in comparison) Earth. In Matty’s Paradigm the sun is smaller than the Earth by the same factor by which the Earth is smaller than the sun in mainstream science (SciPop).
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12) KJV
You can’t use the mass of the sun as the reason why the solar system has to be heliocentric any more. It’s just part of the strong delusion. Sorry. Game over.
It seems beyond strange that Newton’s Principia Mathematica was first published in 1728 and yet the post in which we demonstrate how Newton manipulated the math used to calculate the mass of the sun was first published, here, in December 2015. How on Earth could 287 years go by and no one noticed the simple mathematical hack which has been used to delude the whole of mankind? Clearly it was God’s will.
The claim is frequently made that all geocentric models have failed. That’s true, they have, because none of them, ironically, are Biblically accurate. This is why we have to use the term Geocentrospheric. It can’t fail. We live in a Geocentrospheric system, it’s happening around us. Not to mention the fact that the one described here is Biblically accurate.
The reason for creation is the manifestation of sentient life with free will.
– The Reason for Creation
The Return of Elijah?
For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah when he said, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness: ‘Prepare the way of the Lord; make his paths straight.’”
(Matthew 3:3) English Standard version
And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
(Matthew 17:11) KJV
It would be foolish of us to claim to have some kind of intellectual superiority over the whole rest of the world because it’s not even necessary for such a simple arithmetic switch. What else could it be but the working out of God’s will? If the delusion was part of God’s plan, and he has now lifted the veil, then it would suggest that something major is about to happen. You’ve been warned.
Voyager
Of the many things that people throw out as supposedly proof of heliocentricity, one that has come up many times, is Doppler shift in transmissions from the Voyager spacecraft.
The story goes that the distance to the Voyagers decreases at certain times during the year and this is detectable. The explanation is that for a period of time each year, as the earth orbits the sun, it’s traveling in the same direction as the Voyagers as they recede into space, but it’s moving faster than they are. The earth starts to catch up with them.
This isn’t proof of heliocentricity, it’s simply the way that you rationalize the observation from the heliocentric frame of reference. The Geocentrospheric explanation is that the earth is stationary and the flight path of the Voyagers includes annual epicycles. The epicycles are caused by the relative motion of the sun.
The purpose of creation is to bring about the permanent physical separation of light from darkness, day from night, good from evil.
– The Purpose of Creation
Garbage in = Garbage out
People today, by and large, will believe anything that they can see a computer model of. We’ve heard it said that the reason that the geocentric model failed is that there’s no computer model of it. This is another demonstration that people today, by and large, are completely clueless. Sorry, but what else could it be? A heliocentric model, computerized or not, is also a Geocentrospheric model. The difference is relative motion.
There’s an excellent example which shows how ridiculously easy it is to get a computer model to switch back forth from heliocentric to Geocentrospheric.
Voyager I and II Flight Path
- You will need a desktop browser.
- Use the sidebar on the right to show the options.
- Select earth as the frame of reference.
- Bingo!
- Now you can see the flight path of the Voyagers, and the other planetary bodies, as they epicycle through space in a Geocentrospheric computer model.
Salvation
- Call upon the name of Jesus Christ,
- believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead,
- confess your sin.
Read through the Bible in a year
| Reading plan | April 8 | |
| Linear | 2 Kings 10-12 | |
| Chronological | 1 Samuel 1-3 |
Matty's Paradigm 