Though they dig into hell, thence shall mine hand take them; though they climb up to heaven, thence will I bring them down:(Amos 9:2) KJV
Are we serious? Are we for real? Are we really talking about hell as if it’s a real place? Yep. Matty’s Paradigm is significantly different from any other theory of creation out there for several reasons:
- We have a physical process for the beginning of hell,
- deduced from a Biblical theory of gravitation.
- We have a reason for hell deduced from the purpose of creation:
- We have a model of the internal structure of Earth that reconciles hell with seismological data.
- The expansion of hell is the cause of global warming,
- as evidenced by a body of oceanographic data which shows that the oceans are warming from the bottom up.
Today we’re going to look at part 1 above. We find ourselves having to re-educate humanity regarding the internal structure of the Earth because there’s perfect congruence between the broad narrative of scripture, and a broad narrative of Physics. They’re one and the same.
We all have the same evidence. Our choice of paradigm determines what we think it’s evidence of.– Matty’s Razor
The Opposition to Hell
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.(2 Timothy 4:3-4) NKJV
Most people, Christian or not, don’t believe in a physical hell. Regardless of religious affiliation (or lack of) hell has fallen between the cracks of mythology. It’s rather ironic since data is flooding in from all over the Earth that GROUND SURFACE TEMPERATURES are the leading source of climate change, whether it be atmospheric or oceanic.
Opposition to the idea that hell is real is basically everything everywhere. For the most part if you tell someone today that you believe that hell is real they’re going to think that you’re somewhere on a scale between quaint and lunatic. That’s fine. It simply means that the people of our times have been trained to be incapable of independent thought. However, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing because this is, after all, God’s plan and he knows what he’s doing.
We can classify the opposition to hell into two broad categories, religious and secular. Secular opposition to hell includes current theories of Earth’s internal structure which everybody is taught because there’s nothing else. Part of this is a pseudoscientific rationalization of the premise that nuclear decay rates have always been constant. It gives us some light entertainment, like were Adam and Eve toast? but we can resolve the problem of exponentially decreasing nuclear decay if hell is at the center of the Earth.
Religious opposition to hell comes out of textual criticism and an attempt to mold Christian doctrine and teaching to be aligned with secular beliefs. To make a long story short, Christianity was infiltrated by sun worshipers who then crafted THE NARRATIVE of mainstream science (SciPop). On one hand, evil has been at work and there have been wolves among the flock weakening Christian doctrine, but on the other hand, since this is all part of God’s grand plan it’s not necessary to blame anyone. It’s a fulfillment of prophecy about something that the Bible refers to as a strong delusion.
Hell? Really? – Navigation
|2||The Broad Narrative of Physics||Colossians 2:8|
|3||The Opposition to Hell||2 Timothy 4:3-4|
|4||Current Theories of Earth’s Internal Structure||Deuteronomy 32:22|
|5||The Mathematics of Hell||Leviticus 19:36|
|6||YEC Spaghetti Theology||John 16:13|
|7||Anti-Hell Christian Leadership||1 Peter 2:13-14|
- Call upon the name of Jesus Christ,
- believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead,
- confess your sin.
Read through the Bible in a year
|Reading plan||July 7|