Here's an example of how the popular science narrative of godless existence (SciPop) combines truth and error: real observations are blended with speculation about unknown causes.
Are we Anti-science? NO
People accuse us of being anti-science. We understand why. On the face of it we've evaluated the scientific method, found it wanting, and rejected it. We exposed the logical fallacy of scientific truths.
Gall as a Cause
Gall can be brazen boldness coupled with impudent assurance and insolence. Someone heard the Bible being preached but decided that they're immune. Their attitude was that it's irrelevant and doesn't refer to them.
Predictive Prophecy
People, even Christians, commonly claim is that the Bible isn't scientific. One reason being that it doesn't make any predictions which can be tested. We'll show you that the Bible is predictive, testable and scientific.
Failed Science and the Strong Delusion
The truth about God is self-evident but we've all been given free will. Therefore there must be a plausible alternative to the truth for those who want it. It's called the strong delusion or the power of error.
Isolating the Error in Failed Science
Popular science (SciPop) has a theoretical foundation. We refer to it as the SciPop paradigm. You may see it referred to in places as the DPMS (dominant paradigm of modern science).
It’s Impossible to Find the Truth Using the Scientific Method
According to the rules of the scientific method, popular science (SciPop) and the truth are mutually exclusive. This is by design, it's not an accident.
Science
What is science? The word is used to refer to beneficial technology like the iPhone but also to a pseudoscientific narrative of godless existence. The word, as used, refers to a mixture of truth and error.
The Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
The Bible accounts for the Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Popular science (SciPop) grudgingly arrived at this conclusion but it has no cause for it or source for the material used. The Bible gives us both.
The Induced Axioms of Failed Science
Yesterday we looked at definitions of axioms, corollaries and principles. We've diagnosed the five inherent flaws in the theoretical foundation of popular science (SciPop), its supposed axioms.
