300 Foxes and a Donkey's Jawbone
The next steps are to build these highly complex molecular structures into systems like: chloroplasts, where photosynthesis takes place for changing light into chemical potential energy; mitochondria, for generating chemical potential energy from food; and the sophisticated DNA – RNA system for storing and replicating inheritable information. Membranes allow the rapid development of complexity, and …
Organic Chemistry. It doesn't take long smashing Hydrogen atoms together to make all of the elements of the Periodic Table. There is one particular element, Carbon, that has a remarkable chemistry. So much so that the chemistry of Carbon is a separate field of study: Organic Chemistry. Shown here is the molecule Ethane, as Chemical …
Noah's flood was a world wide cataclysmic event that drastically changed both the surface of the Earth and its internal structure. So where's the evidence? Literally everywhere.
If you choose to believe what unbelievers write and say about the Bible, because you don't want it to be true, you're just fooling yourself, or attempting to. You're using circular reasoning.
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) have incorporated evolution INTO creation. You don't need to argue creation vs. evolution any more.
The belief that humans evolved stems from a desire to deny that we're accountable to God, or that there is a God. The rationalization of this premise is what we know of as popular science (SciPop).
Cladistic phylogenetic analysis is circular reasoning based on personal bias.
There were two horses on Noah’s ark but now there are at least seven species in genus Equus. That's speciation or macro-evolution. It's not a problem because the process of evolution has a scriptural context.
In a his book called “Blueprint for a Cell: The Nature and Origin of Life” Nobel Laureate Christian DeDuve demonstrates conclusively that all of life is based on cellular construction.
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) used the same evidence that mainstream science (SciPop) uses but got a different result, so SciPop isn't repeatable. Therefore, according to the scientific method, SciPop isn't scientific.