It's impossible to prove that radioisotopes have always decayed at a constant rate throughout history, since the ability to detect and measure radioactive decay is only about 120 years old.
Science Needs Faith
A lot of people are involved in the science vs. faith debate. This is rather ironic since what they refer to as "science" is a sad parody called mainstream science (SciPop) which requires just as much faith as any religion does.
Salvation
Matty's Paradigm is huge and complex, but don't worry, it's not necessary for salvation. What you believe about the Bible and science doesn't effect salvation. There's no quiz or exam.
Separation of Heart and Mind
By examining the Biblical characteristics of heart and mind we've reconciled two concepts: the soul as our consciousness and personality, and the soul as a gravity node.
Visible and Invisible
We're using a deductive approach and allowing the Bible to reveal to us the way in which it interacts with our environment. This brings up an issue: We need to clarify the usage of two words, spiritual and physical. Holy spirit) use systematic deduction, allowing the Bible to reveal how it interacts with our environment. As such, we need to clarify the usage of two words, spiritual and physical.
What Purpose?
Danby House And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. Romans 8:28 What kind of purpose are we talkimg about? God's purpose for our lives?God's purpose for making creation? Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of …
Tares Among Wheat
The purpose of creation is to give life with free will to all souls. God created companions to fellowship with, but he is not going to force anyone to spend eternity with him. You have the free will to choose.
July 16th
Perdition can be translated "ruin." Perdition is a nuanced kind of destruction with eternal consequences. It’s not the end of something, as if it disappears. It’s the end of what could have been.
April 20th
Does Einstein's relativity disprove that the universe has an absolute frame of reference? No. It's an inductive rationalization of the premise that there isn't one.
April 16th
Newton gave SciPop the math it needed to remove Earth from the center of the universe, and hell from the center of Earth. His work is based on bold guesses. They were wrong.
