The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thessalonians 2:9-12) NKJV
According to the rules of the scientific method, popular science (SciPop) and the truth are mutually exclusive. This is by design, it’s not an accident.
Supposedly the scientific method is a rigorously constructed logical process of investigation where Victorian era blowhard polemics are exposed as frauds and real information prevails.
The reality is that the scientific method is a meticulously crafted philosophical Catch 22 where the truth is de facto eliminated as a possible conclusion. It’s a dazzling piece of intellectual Kung Fu designed by atheist intellectual elites to make finding the truth impossible, for the purpose of making it look like God is irrelevant. The practical reality is that popular science and truth are mutually exclusive. This is known as Popper’s Paradox.
It’s been accomplished by establishing what look like reasonable and sensible rules for how we handle data and experimental results. It starts by proposing a hypothesis which has to be predictive, testable and, ironically, falsifiable. The truth can’t be falsified, if it could, it wouldn’t be true.
The Scientific Method
- The Truth:
- God is a Spirit.
- The Scientific Method:
- The Truth is neither testable nor falsifiable,
- therefore it’s unscientific and must be rejected.
- According to the rules of the scientific method:
- Failed science (SciPop) and the truth are mutually exclusive.
We can plug this directly into the broad narrative of scripture and the outworking of the will of God through the passage above. If popular science (SciPop) is a false narrative of godless existence then it’s the lie. People believe the lie because they think that it’s based on rigorous scientific investigation which is constrained by the scientific method, which is the strong delusion.
Salvation
- Call upon the name of Jesus Christ,
- believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead,
- confess your sin.
Wow you’re kinda right about something for a change. But sadly the glints of understanding are sprinkled over a lot off bullshit.
first science is can only give answers about how the natural world works and God by his nature is beyond the bounds of nature and cannot be tested by science. Okay I’ll grant you that so what? Why is this some gotcha? Science has it limitations and it isn’t the only source of knowledge. The question of god is a question for philosophy which science can only give slight input . For example a documented miracle that cannot be explained by current science could offer support to the idea that there is a supernatural being.
Ad hominem. You lose.
You just showed you have no idea what a ad hominem is.
A Ad hominem is saying something like person x is wrong because they are a poopyhead. It’s when you use insult in replacement of logical argument.
Say something like hey moron you’re wrong for reasons x y and z is not a Ad Homeinem. It seems you’re under the the impression that a Ad hominem is just another term for insult. Your wrong its when you use the insult as proof that the person is wrong. It’s not when you use insults while explaining why somebody is wrong,
Also once again you’re dodging the question.