One of our favorite books is "A Brief History of Time," by Stephen Hawking. In this and his other books Hawking expands use of the scientific method as an inductive tool. He opened up the realm of plausibility.
The Hawking Effect
If God is Love, Why Would He Send People to Hell?
We use empirical observations & physical evidence to show that the Bible is an accurate description of the universe. We can now answer the question: If God is love, why would He send people to hell?
Truth is Light, Darkness is Evil
It's ironic that the period of history that brought us the scientific advances of Galileo, Kepler and Newton is called The Enlightenment, because this was when the human race plunged into darkness.
Archaeopteris
We're critical of the philosophical construction of the scientific method because it's been meticulously crafted to exclude any possibility that the truth can be either an acceptable premise, or a possible conclusion.
July 26th
Scientific hypotheses must be falsifiable but the truth can’t be falsified, if it could it wouldn’t be true. Therefore mainstream science (SciPop) and the truth are mutually exclusive.
May 18th
A new definition of "scientific knowledge" has arisen in post-Hawking mainstream science (SciPop) thanks to atheist science trolls (ASTs) scientifically illiterate science worshipers (SISWs) and SciPop devotees.
January 25th
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) use scripture with the scientific method to test the hypothesis that "the deep," the Word of God, and Jesus Christ are synonyms of the same Divine aspect of the Trinity: God the Son.
January 16th
What happens when the truth isn't testable? That means it's not scientific. It's not a problem though. We love science so much that we can use it to glorify God.
Pink Unicorns and the Scientific Method
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) destroyed the theoretical foundation of mainstream science (SciPop). If the best you can do in defense of SciPop is invoke a pink, purple or rainbow Unicorn, then SciPop doesn't stand a chance.
Mainstream Science has Failed
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) used the same evidence that mainstream science (SciPop) uses but got a different result, so SciPop isn't repeatable. Therefore, according to the scientific method, SciPop isn't scientific.