The narrative of Genesis 2 picks up with a broad synopsis of the creative process necessary to provide an environment where intelligent sentient beings, including Homo sapiens, will live.
When you use a computer to analyze data it has to be coded in a form that the computer can understand. This is where personal bias and circular reasoning starts: not in the analysis, in the coding.
Why would God send a strong delusion if we've been given knowledge of the truth? Do you love the truth, or hate it? Some people don't want it. You have a choice. You can believe anything you want.
Overcoming is when we allow the Word of God to change us and make us more like the Lord. It's when we realize that there is no spoon.
When God said, "Let There be Light," he used the H+ in the deep to create all of the other atomic nuclei - the whole periodic table of elements.
The process of evolution, as genetic decay, is extensively documented. There's no reason to deny it. It gets us from Noah's flood to the present day.
If I’m right, and the theoretical foundation of modern science is really nothing more than an alternative to the truth, this has some serious implications. Not the least of which is the role that the great minds of science have played throughout history. There are a few key individuals who made leaps of faith, and …
According to science the Earth is an insignificant speck that orbits another insignificant speck that drifts through a cosmos so vast that we are, for want of a better word, insignificant. The Bible teaches us the exact opposite, that the Earth is the center of creation and that God, as omnicient and omnipresent as He …
What if we told you that the world popular science wants you to believe in, an insignificant speck orbiting an insignificant speck drifting through a vast cosmos, is a false narrative of godless existence? Do you even care?
What if popular science (SciPop) is a false theoretical construct, like the Matrix, designed to make you think that believing in God is stupid?