This article is sophomoric drivel with no scientific value at all. However it does contain a smoking gun quote which demonstrates the circular nature of stellar parallax.
Do Space Flights Require Heliocentricity?
It is a prevailing belief that space flights are planned using a heliocentric model of our solar system, and therefore Geocentrosphericity is impossible. This is the worst kind of scientific superficiality possible. Firstly, heliocentricity is a theoretical model of the empirical Geocentrospheric reality. As such they coexist but one is real and the other is …
Continue reading "Do Space Flights Require Heliocentricity?"
Stellar Parallax
Stellar parallax is used to "verify" that the Earth is moving but it's dependent upon the A priori assumption that the Earth is moving. In case you weren't sure, that's circular reasoning.
The Geometry of Despair
Measurable parallax would be proof that the Earth isn't at the center of God's creation in which case the issue of whether or not God created it has new significance. Unfortunately Galileo couldn't find any parallax.
Prove that You don’t Have Faith
The traditional battle lines of science vs. faith is a false dichotomy. Popular science (SciPop) can’t be the opposite of faith because SciPop requires faith.
e·clip·tic /əˈkliptik/
We love our trolls. They help in so many ways. The first is by boosting our engagement stats. The second is the encouragement that we get from them. A troll said the nicest thing that anyone has said to us in a long time:
Effect and Cause
Why are planetary orbits elliptical? We've considered this as an example of how to understand frame of reference, but Newton supposedly solved this problem mathematically in Principia Mathematica:
Are We Breaking the Speed Limit?
The Bible describes the Sun either standing still or going backwards so it seems appropriate to examine the account of creation to see if the scripture could actually accommodate a Geocentrospheric system.
When Empirical Isn’t
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) were asked: if Newton's law of universal gravitation is an empirical formula, how is the accepted mass of the sun (1.9^E30 kg) not empirical?
Relative Motion
There's no observable difference between heliocentric and Geocentrospheric models because they're two frames of reference in the same system. They coexist.
