After more than two decades of precision measurements, we've now reached the "gold standard" for how the pieces don't fit.
Does the expansion of the Universe break the speed of light?
Just 13.8 billion years after the hot Big Bang, we can see 46.1 billion light-years away in all directions. Doesn't that violate…something?
Redshift
The main evidence for the expansion of the universe is something called redshift. Redshift is the tendency for the light of far away objects to be composed of wavelengths at the red end of the spectrum.
The Expansion of the Universe
The expansion of the universe isn't a testable hypothesis so it's not scientific. The theory is accepted because it compliments the mainstream science narrative of godless existence (SciPop).
The Hubble Constant
Sir Edwin Hubble was one of the first to suggest that the apparent red shift of stellar objects is caused by the doppler effect as the universe expands and the stars become further and further away.
Gravitational Time Dilation
The Bible predicts time dilation as observed. It is caused by the operation of gravity according to our axiomatic definition, which is congruent with practical mathematical applications.
April 21st
“Redshift” shows the danger of Peer Review: if speculation enhances the atheist narrative (SciPop), the scientific community ignores the scientific method.
February 17th
SciPop (the atheist human origins narrative) is an inductive rationalization of the premise that the universe doesn't require a divine origin. All evidence of the supernatural has to be rationalized as something else.
Hypothesis 6
In Matty's Paradigm we believe that the universe is enclosed in a crystalline sphere called the firmament, so it can't be expanding. Obviously there's some other explanation for the apparent redshift of stellar objects.
