300 Foxes and a Donkey's Jawbone
The popular science narrative of godless existence (SciPop) isn’t science.
We, Matty, have a science background and a SciFi passion. We're also Christian. We thought that it would be cool to write a best selling SciFi adventure which could explore the spiritual ramifications of Artificial Intelligence.
If God testifies that science falsely so called is a thing, then that means that science must also be a thing. Science is that which may be known about the one true God.
Popular science (SciPop) has put more stumbling blocks to faith in front of more people than probably anything in human history.
Today is a victory because our challenge, for anyone to prove heliocentricity, still stands (since December 25, 2015). At first a lot of people sent us links to articles which supposedly proved heliocentricity. They didn't.
Truth is absolute, unchanging. Popular science (SciPop) is in continual flux. They're mutually exclusive. The scientific method is designed to make finding the truth impossible, even by accident.
As simple and convenient the young Earth creation (YEC) variable rate of nuclear decay response to radiometric dating may be, it's also an Achilles Heel.
The featured image is what popular science (SciPop) wants you to think the interior of the Earth looks like. SciPop doesn't want you to lie in bed at night worried about hell. SciPop is your friend. Good old SciPop.
SciPop is a thermodynamic perpetual motion machine. It's purely theoretical. It's fundamental premises aren't testable hypotheses so, technically, it's not scientific. How about that? SciPop isn't scientific.
A lot of people are involved in the science vs. faith debate. This is rather ironic since what they refer to as "science" is a sad parody called mainstream science (SciPop) which requires just as much faith as any religion does.
Popular science (SciPop) is false, but there's no alternative to it that accurately accounts for our observations of the universe and the testimony of Scripture. People have tried to do this, but they tried from within the SciPop paradigm, which is why they failed.