Atheism’s Accomplice

O Timothy! Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge—by professing it some have strayed concerning the faith. Grace be with you. Amen.

(1 Timothy 6:20-21) NKJV

Atheism’s sidekick: The scientific method, designed by atheist intellectual elites for the express purpose of making it impossible to find the truth, even by accident.

The way it works is like this: Popular science (SciPop) has set itself the goal of giving an account of the origin of humanity which requires no supernatural cause? Why? Because, according to SciPop, the supernatural can’t be detected therefore it doesn’t exist. This is the practical ramification:

The Scientific Method

  1. The Truth:
    • God is a Spirit.
  2. The Scientific Method:
    • The Truth is neither testable nor falsifiable,
    • therefore it’s unscientific and must be rejected.
  3. According to the rules of the scientific method:
    • popular science (SciPop) and the truth are mutually exclusive.

SciPop and truth are mutually exclusive, and this is by design, not by accident. It manifests as a system designed to promote investigative objectivity, while not drawing attention to the fact that it’s founding premise, the universe has no supernatural cause, can’t be shown to be true.

SciPop doesn’t know what it can’t detect because it can’t detect it, and it’s more likely the case that SciPop is detecting the supernatural cause of the universe, it just doesn’t know it.

The practical outcome of this is a complex system in which induction is used to rationalize an explanation for all observed phenomenon to fit this premise. As such, scientific knowledge isn’t knowledge, it’s an inductive rationalization of circumstantial evidence.

Scientific knowledge: anecdotal evidence combined with probability means it’s a reasonable assumption.

– Scientific knowledge, a definition for the post-Hawking popular science (SciPop) Trekkie generation

This also means that anything that has been labelled as a scientific fact, but which is an induction of rationale designed to establish part of the narrative and which is only true in the SciPop paradigm, can’t be a fact. A fact is not paradigm-dependent and should be true regardless of what you believe about God or the origin of the universe.

The Logical Fallacy of “Scientific Truths”

  • IF scientific truths are strategic data points placed to establish the popular science narrative of godless existence (SciPop),
    • BUT the universe exists because God created it,
  • THEN SciPop isn’t truth.

If something is a fact then it has to be incorporated into whatever belief system you subscribe to. That’s the reason for Matty’s Paradigm. SciPop is a mixture of truth and error. The trick is to discern what’s true and what’s not. What’s fact and what’s induced narrative?

The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) is an example. It’s there, we can detect it. How did it get there isn’t even speculative, it’s the expected result of the process of nucleosynthesis. Something happened which caused the periodic table of elements to form: It’s fact.

In SciPop this is the beginning of the universe, the big bang, but the problem is that there’s no source of material, in this case Hydrogen nuclei. This is where SciPop enters the realm of speculation: induced narrative.

The Bible, on the other hand, gives us the source of the Hydrogen in it’s second sentence.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

(Genesis 1:1-2) KJV

This is before God said, let there be light, therefore the deep is the source of Hydrogen for nucleosynthesis. It’s quite a simple process. It’s called deduction.

These are some of the scientific concepts which we have found in scripture.

Scientific Concepts in Scripture

  • Particle Physics
    1. First cause (before the big bang),
    2. Particle physics and the origin of the deep,
    3. Nucleosynthesis and the origin of the periodic table of elements (the big bang),
    4. Neutrons and the inherent corruption in the universe,
    5. the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR).
  • Abiogenesis and the origin of life
    • Descent with modification (devolution).
  • Gravity
    • gravity and the core accretion model,
    • the firmament and the missing mass of the universe,
    • the brightly shining wall on the edge of space.
  • Relativity
    • Absolute frame of reference and the weak nuclear force,
    • frame of reference and the Geocentrospheric model,
    • the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism,
    • a unified theory of everything, gravity, magnetism and redemption.
  • Geology
    • Radial shrinkage and circumferential shortening,
    • Plate tectonics.

One Reply to “Atheism’s Accomplice”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: