F the pied pipers of Hamelin who've been leading a generation to destruction @RichardDawkins @BillNye @neiltyson HAVE any intellectual integrity at all THEN they'll publicly acknowledge that Matty's Paradigm is scientifically valid.
People accuse us of being anti-science. We understand why. On the face of it we've evaluated the scientific method, found it wanting, and rejected it. We exposed the logical fallacy of scientific truths.
Logic, no matter how rigorous, breaks down when we're speculating about the origin of the universe from the starting point of having rejected the truth: God revealed testimony about our origin.
Modern Astronomy is a pseudoscientific validation of the Star Trek universe for the purpose of making you think that Biblical prophecy about stars falling to Earth is ludicrous.
Physical laws describe broad classes of observations. They're a summary of what we know. They don't define the universe, they're defined by the universe.
For centuries the scientific mainstream has been building a narrative of godless existence (SciPop). The purpose of SciPop is to account for human existence in a way that requires no supernatural cause.
"I'm not a scientist..." is the response that we (that's me and the Holy spirit) used to get whenever we tried to talk with a Pastor about science. It precedes an admission of ignorance.
Christian apologists have been playing defense for generations. They've worked to keep the Bible relevant while the world of popular science (SciPop) became an intellectual Death Star and destroyed any competing paradigm.
Continuing the theme of weird things that people say on social media there's another question which comes up from time to time which pertains to Jesus' teaching on hell.
How would you rationalize this remarkable event, during which the sun went backwards for 40 minutes, in a heliocentric system? It's anyone's guess, but there are several steps required.