Hypothesis 41

IF the pied pipers of Hamelin who've been leading a generation to destruction @RichardDawkins @BillNye @neiltyson HAVE any intellectual integrity at all THEN they'll publicly acknowledge that Matty's Paradigm is scientifically valid.

Are we Anti-science? NO

People accuse us of being anti-science. We understand why. On the face of it we've evaluated the scientific method, found it wanting, and rejected it. We exposed the logical fallacy of scientific truths.

Inductive Reasoning

Logic, no matter how rigorous, breaks down when we're speculating about the origin of the universe from the starting point of having rejected the truth: God revealed testimony about our origin.

Astronomy

Modern Astronomy is a pseudoscientific validation of the Star Trek universe for the purpose of making you think that Biblical prophecy about stars falling to Earth is ludicrous.

SciPop

For centuries the scientific mainstream has been building a narrative of godless existence (SciPop). The purpose of SciPop is to account for human existence in a way that requires no supernatural cause.