F the pied pipers of Hamelin who've been leading a generation to destruction @RichardDawkins @BillNye @neiltyson HAVE any intellectual integrity at all THEN they'll publicly acknowledge that Matty's Paradigm is scientifically valid.
Hypothesis 41
Are we Anti-science? NO
People accuse us of being anti-science. We understand why. On the face of it we've evaluated the scientific method, found it wanting, and rejected it. We exposed the logical fallacy of scientific truths.
Scientifically Illiterate Science Worshipers
We (that's me and the Holy Spirit) asked Twitter: Why is the interior of the Earth hot? It revealed a lot about people who occupy the supposed intellectual high ground.
October 5th
The mainstream science paradigm (SciPop) wasn't deduced from axioms, its axioms were induced by accepting the premise of the paradigm. SciPop axioms aren't axiomatic, they're inductive reductive circular reasoning.
Matty's Paradigm 