Popular science (SciPop) is an inductive rationalization of the the premise that the universe has no divine, supernatural cause. Unfortunately the universe has a divine, supernatural cause.
Truth
Truth isn't falsifiable so, technically, there's no hypothesis for it. What if it isn't testable either? That means it's unscientific. And yet it's still the truth. We're watching a philosophical train wreck in slow-motion.
Science
What is science? The word is used to refer to beneficial technology like the iPhone but also to a pseudoscientific narrative of godless existence. The word, as used, refers to a mixture of truth and error.
Science vs. Faith
The science vs. faith debate is smoke and mirrors because the words "science" and "faith" are poorly understood. The problem is that the words, as used, have definitions which don't fit the usage.
What is a Fact?
Someone made the charge that we're denying science. It looked like the knee-jerk reaction of someone with a progressive agenda, a scientifically illiterate science worshiper (SISW). We attempted to explain two things:
Matty’s Harmonization
We're harmonizing science with the Bible. How can this be possible if, superficially, science and the Bible look completely different? We have to know what's real science and what's not.
Matty’s Razor
The idea that evidence is neutral and we all have access to it is known as Matty's Razor. Evidence doesn't lead to a conclusion, it just is. How we interpret evidence is determined by what we believe. It's called cognitive bias.
The New Scientific Knowledge
Knowledge and facts are things which ought to be true regardless of what we believe about God or the origin of the universe. Therefore, something which is only true in the popular science paradigm (SciPop) isn't knowledge.
October 5th
SciPop wasn’t deduced from Axioms, the Axioms were INDUCED by accepting the premise of the Atheist paradigm. SciPop axioms aren't axiomatic, they're inductive reductive circular reasoning.
