If you use circular reasoning to induce a rationalization of the premise that there's no hell, but there is a hell, and then you code your rationale as math, does hell disappear?
Can Math Prove There’s no Hell?
Were Adam and Eve Toast? by Joe Meert
This is a direct copy of Joe Meert's post as of 8/29/2018 We decided to preserve it here because because he'll probably want to delete it.
Severing the Link Between Mass and Gravity (transcript)
Matty's Paradigm. A scientific theory of creation. By Matty Lawrence A Bible-based complete plugin replacement for the theoretical foundation of modern science. Also known as Geo centro spheric devolutionary creation.
Numerical Computation of a Simple Orbit
Programming a computer to plot an ellipse with one focus isn't the same as providing a physical cause for why planetary orbits are elliptical. This is an example of scientific sleight-of-hand.
March 14th
It's March 14 which could be written as 3.14, which is Π. Despite the atheist propaganda that you may have seen, the Bible gets the value of Π correct.
February 26th
Faith is believing in something that you can't see. Math requires believing in concepts that you can't see, and relating them to each other in ways that can't be seen. Math is inductive, reductive, circular faith.
Attacking the Assumption Underlying the Gravitational Constant G and Variable g
There's an assumption underlying Newton's understanding of gravity and the theoretical basis of the gravitational constant G and variable g. It's time to attack it.
Noah’s Math
Some folk think that they can use 19th Century Uniformitarianism to show that Noah's flood didn't happen. We hate to break it to you, but, this is the 21st Century.
Radial Shrinkage and the Pillars of the Earth
I had a tweet that asked the question: Why is the interior of the Earth hot? This started a conversation that revealed what we really know about the interior of the Earth. It started like this:
When Empirical Isn’t
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) were asked: if Newton's law of universal gravitation is an empirical formula, how is the accepted mass of the sun (1.9^E30 kg) not empirical?