A lot of people are involved in the science vs. faith debate. This is rather ironic since what they refer to as "science" is a sad parody called mainstream science (SciPop) which requires just as much faith as any religion does.
Science Needs Faith
Visible and Invisible
We're using a deductive approach and allowing the Bible to reveal to us the way in which it interacts with our environment. This brings up an issue: We need to clarify the usage of two words, spiritual and physical. Holy spirit) use systematic deduction, allowing the Bible to reveal how it interacts with our environment. As such, we need to clarify the usage of two words, spiritual and physical.
April 20th
Does Einstein's relativity disprove that the universe has an absolute frame of reference? No. It's an inductive rationalization of the premise that there isn't one.
April 16th
Newton gave SciPop the math it needed to remove Earth from the center of the universe, and hell from the center of Earth. His work is based on bold guesses. They were wrong.
February 25th
The words faith and theory are synonyms. Sight and empirical are also synonyms. Empirical evidence is what we see. What we choose to believe about it is our faith.
January 24th
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) resolved the Holy Trinity with particle physics and we can now calculate the mass of the observable universe as a portion of the total mass of the universe.
Prove that You don’t Have Faith
The traditional battle lines of science vs. faith is a false dichotomy. Popular science (SciPop) can’t be the opposite of faith because SciPop requires faith.
The 3 Aspects of Scientific Faith
The traditional battle line of science vs. faith is a false dichotomy because what people call "science" is actually popular science (SciPop) which requires 3 aspects of faith: ignorance, motivational and developmental.