So we (that's me and the Holy spirit (my imaginary friend (sent by my magical sky daddy))) have been practicing golf. Why, of all things, golf? Well, for one,
Concentration
Elliptical vs. Cardioid
We need to know that some concepts are paradigm-dependent. This means that they only apply after accepting the premise of a paradigm. We've been discussing elliptical planetary orbits, that's a heliocentric concept.
Conic Sections
When we ask the question: what's at the second focus in Kepler's laws there's another stock response which comes up with surprising frequency. It appears that everyone has been trained to give this answer.
Garbage in = Garbage Out
People point to Newton who wrote math which shows that an ellipse can have one focus. Math is theoretical fudge which can be made into any shape you want based entirely on whatever you want to believe.
The Voice of One
Prepare ye the way of the Lord. Perhaps the spirit of Elijah is here, in which case, this is another sign of the times.
Elijah
Christianity has been absently meandering alongside the wide road to destruction as an accomplice to popular science (SciPop) for generations. So why are we trying to wake these people up? Why now?
A writer, scribe: γραμματεὺς – grammateus
Deduction is a wonderful thing. When applied to practical life situations it's as straight forwards as: when one door closes, another door opens. When the doors are closed the conclusion that we may deduce is: it's time to stay put.
Numerical Computation of a Simple Orbit
Programming a computer to plot an ellipse with one focus isn't the same as providing a physical cause for why planetary orbits are elliptical. This is an example of scientific sleight-of-hand.
April 12th
Despite the self-evident truth of empirical observations, science promotes a rationalization for them that has no physical cause. It is not a testable hypothesis. Science is unscientific.