Despite the fact that popular science (SciPop) appears to have a compelling rationale for why hell isn't at the center of the Earth, it's very easy to demonstrate the weaknesses of this rationale.
Primary or Secondary?
Hitchens's razor is based on assuming that secondary sources of evidence, vetted and approved by Peer Review to be compliant with the popular science paradigm (SciPop), are primary sources of evidence.
Epistemological Abuse
Hitchens's razor isn't a philosophical tenet which regulates the use of evidence, it's proof of a failure to understand what evidence is and how it's used. We all have exactly the same evidence.
Heliocentric vs. Geocentrospheric?
An overwhelming majority of people believe that we observe the Earth orbiting the sun but it’s not an observation, heliocentricity is theoretical. We observe the cosmos from Earth, which makes it Geocentrospheric.
The Stratigraphic Column
One of the pillars of the popular science paradigm (SciPop) is the acceptance of sleight-of-hand and smoke-and-mirrors in place of science. Pithy memes, false definitions have become its propaganda.
Science Needs Faith
A lot of people are involved in the science vs. faith debate. This is rather ironic since what they refer to as "science" is a sad parody called mainstream science (SciPop) which requires just as much faith as any religion does.
July 25th
We all have the same evidence. Our choice of paradigm determines what we think it's evidence of. - Matty's Razor
July 24th
Hitchens's razor is epistemological sleight-of-hand which fails to distinguish justified belief from opinion.
January 17th
We (me and the Holy spirit) have identified 5 leaps of faith in SciPop (the atheist human origins narrative formerly taught as "science" in universities). They're used as axioms but they're induced, so they can't be.
Prove that You don’t Have Faith
The traditional battle lines of science vs. faith is a false dichotomy. Popular science (SciPop) can’t be the opposite of faith because SciPop requires faith.
