300 Foxes and a Donkey's Jawbone
One of the most helpful things for a Christian to know is the context of evolution. The traditional battle lines of the debate have been creation vs. evolution, but that's a trap designed to distract you from the real issue. THEN there was no evolution before sin.
Evolution is poorly understood by Christians. The science vs. faith debate has been framed around creation vs. evolution because Christians don't understand it. The issue is irrelevant and they're being played.
Abiogenesis is the six days of creation, it produced fully formed Homo sapiens, evolution is the process of genetic decay which began in Genesis 3 at the fall of man.
If the truth about God is self-evident, as we're told in Romans chapter 1 and which is confirmed by Hypothesis 16, what's the significance for atheism? Atheism isn't intellectually viable.
Given that synapomorphies only occur after the process of evolution has started, and evolution is a consequence of sin, it's appropriate to change the spelling of synapomorphy to sinapomorphy.
The Bible describes a sequential process of creating life by sphere: hydrosphere, lithosphere, firmasphere, atmosphere and biosphere.
Evolution on the scale needed in the atheist narrative (SciPop) requires death, but there was no death before sin. It's not possible for evolution to be the origin of humanity.
The process of evolution, as genetic decay, is extensively documented. There's no reason to deny it. It gets us from Noah's flood to the present day.
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) have incorporated evolution INTO creation. You don't need to argue creation vs. evolution any more.
The belief that humans evolved stems from a desire to deny that we're accountable to God, or that there is a God. The rationalization of this premise is what we know of as popular science (SciPop).