Using the Matty's Paradigm value for the Sun's mass and Einstein's energy conversion equation (E=mc2) its life expectancy is about 102 years. Now would be a good time to accept Jesus Christ as your savior.
Numerical Computation of a Simple Orbit
Programming a computer to plot an ellipse with one focus isn't the same as providing a physical cause for why planetary orbits are elliptical. This is an example of scientific sleight-of-hand.
April 13th
We (that's me and the Holy spirit) have been pondering Kepler. He was hired by Tycho Brahe as a mathematician to analyze the extensive charts and tables which documented Brahe's observations of the cosmos.
April 12th
Despite the self-evident truth of empirical observations, science promotes a rationalization for them that has no physical cause. It is not a testable hypothesis. Science is unscientific.
April 11th
Myth buster: The Earth-sun orbit isn’t elliptical. The Earth-sun radius is, for all practical purposes, constant. Any apparent eccentricity is variation in the Sun’s orbital radius, not the Earth-sun radius.
April 10th
The Bible doesn't describe a heliocentric system, but that's okay because we don't observe heliocentricity. It's a theoretical interpretation of the empirical geocentrospheric reality: it's imaginary.
April 9th
The Geocentrospheric cosmological model in Matty's Paradigm is a) empirical (directly observable) and b) meets the requirements of Kepler's laws. The heliocentric theory is neither a) nor b).
April 4th
Astronomy has grown around this assumption: stars are suns. It's false. Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Einstein, and others stole the modern mind and gave us an understanding of the cosmos which isn't real.
April 1st
The express purpose of astronomy is to make it seem as if the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy is ridiculous. Unfortunately this means that astronomy has had to become ridiculous. Who are you to believe? And why would you take our word for it?
Transit of Venus
Any time that someone uses the transit of Venus as proof of heliocentricity they’re demonstrating that their knowledge of the subject matter is at or below a superficial level.
