Creation was corrupted before Adam and Eve sinned in the garden of Eden. It was created in a corrupted state in order to manifest free will. We can prove it using a process we call deductive questioning.
A doubtful Christian asked us to establish the logical connection between the statements God can't lie and the Bible is true. This is the premise of Matty's Paradigm so we do need to have a solid grasp of it.
Immanuel Velikovsky reconciled science and the Bible as an atheist. His name is universally scorned but not because he was wrong, because no one wanted to hear what he had to say.
What are the logical implications of "God can't lie?" Total destruction of the popular science (SciPop) paradigm. Figuratively we're going to do to SciPop what Samson did in Lehi with a donkey's jawbone.
Danby House That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us: Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that …
If the Bible is true then it must account for all physical evidence and empirical observations. If we eliminate the assumptions of the popular science paradigm we see that it does.
"in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." Adam didn't drop dead the moment that he ate the fruit, a possible meaning of the text. He lived for 900+ years. Is this a contradiction?
As a result of the meticulous way in which we're building our case for the scientific validity of the Bible, the defense of popular science (SciPop) has crumbled.
The Bible must account for everything we see around us today: in the heavens above and in the earth below. Otherwise God's lying. Since God can't lie we use deduction to show how the pieces fit together.
We've been defending the Geocentrospheric model in the Twitter community since December 25th, 2015. It can't be refuted. There's a simple reason why: It's Biblically accurate.