Stellar spectroscopy conveniently ignores the possibility that stars are reflecting sunlight and incorporates itself into one of the most intricate examples of circular reasoning ever devised. Circular reasoning is a problem in science where people make up fiction that suits their narrative, then use the fiction to rationalize more fiction. A good example is heliocentricity. …
October 30th
Newton didn't make any great discoveries, he called his bold guesses great discoveries and bluffed well enough to get away with it. His Principia Mathematica boldly charges forth based on four incorrect guesses.
October 28th
Uniformitarianism was the centerpiece of SciPop, and radiometric dating was the pseudo-scientific glue which held it together.
October 26th
We use multiple lines of investigation including scripture, empirical observations, theoretical models, and physical evidence to deduce the presence of a sphere of crystal on the edge of space.
October 18th
Evolution is the process of genetic change over time by which the animal kinds saved on Noah's ark gave rise to the current distribution of biodiversity. When combined with plate tectonics it's Hypothesis 35.
October 16th
The inner core is not the same age as the rest of the earth, it is younger. This is consistent with hell beginning at the fall of man in Genesis 3, as described in Deuteronomy 32:22.
October 15th
Most people think that popular science (SciPop) has measured the cosmos, and that Earth's internal structure is well known. They also think that it's all been measured by spacecraft, like Star Trek.
October 13th
Kepler's Laws are the weakest point of the theoretical foundation of popular science (SciPop). The weakness is that Kepler's laws are derived empirically, but they're applied theoretically.
October 12th
The fact that Earth is at the center of the observable universe is empirical. The problem is, does anyone know what empirical means? Here are some definitions.
Can Math Prove There’s no Hell?
If you use circular reasoning to induce a rationalization of the premise that there's no hell, but there is a hell, and then you code your rationale as math, does hell disappear?
