Matty’s Paradigm is profoundly different from the popular science (SciPop) paradigm. This means that it’s also very different from other attempts at a natural theology of the Bible using science.

– Matty’s Paradigm, context


Matty’s Paradigm is here to stay. As such it needs a formal name: Geocentrospheric Devolutionary Creation. It’s fairly self-explanatory, but we’re having fun explaining it.

– Geocentrospheric Devolutionary Creation


The causal relationship between space-time and gravity is universally accepted but it’s an assumption based on circumstantial evidence. Instances of gravity, singularities or nodes, are created by God and have a specific quantity and frequency that affects the properties of the resultant body. Each human soul is a node of gravity which contains our consciousness and personality.

– Gravity, context

Hell is Expanding

Hell is at the center of the earth and its expansion is the cause of global warming. This is a predictive testable hypothesis based on ocean water warming data. The location and size of hell are confirmed by seismological data.

Principia Mattymatica

Is it possible to demonstrate that Matty’s Paradigm isn’t merely an opinion about the Bible? If it could be done, how would it be done? Could Matty’s Paradigm be described as a set of Principles which are deduced from Axioms and Corollaries following the format of Newton’s Principia Mathematica?



A year-long daily devotional that reconciles science with the Bible. From the 6 days of creation through the fall of man, present day, the Millennial Kingdom, and the new heaven and new earth.